PG Game
Hundreds of unions, NGOs in Spain call for general strike in solidarity with Palestine
字号+ Author: Source:Game 2025-01-16 00:02:19 I want to comment(0)
RAWALPINDI: A special court of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on Wednesday deferred the of f
RAWALPINDI: A special court of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on Wednesday deferred the of former prime minister Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, in a registered against them for purchasing an expensive Bulgari jewellery set from Toshakhana at a throwaway price. Judge Shahrukh Arjumand heard the case which was transferred to the special court by an accountability court after the Supreme Court to the National Accountability Ordinance made during the PDM government. The judge scheduled Oct 5 for indicting the founding PTI chairman and his spouse. When the court resumed hearing, a junior lawyer informed the judge that the former PM could not appoint the defence counsel and sought time so that he could engage his defence lawyer. Cross-examination of witness in £190m case remains inconclusive He sought week-long adjournment, which was opposed by the prosecution team. Prosecutor Syed Zulfiqar Abbas Naqvi pointed out that Mr Khan’s legal team would be visiting him at Adiala Jail, and he could engage lawyers for his defence in the case. The court then adjourned further hearing to Oct 5. The defence counsel could not conclude the cross-examination of the last prosecution witness in the £190m corruption reference against Mr Khan and Bushra Bibi. Accountability judge Nasir Javed Rana was hearing the case. The defence team informed the judge that senior lawyers were in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and requested for an adjournment. Subsequently, the hearing was adjourned till Thursday (today). Meanwhile, the IHC extended the stay order issued against the pronouncement of judgement in the same case. An IHC division bench comprising Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb extended the stay order till Oct 10 on a petition seeking acquittal of the couple in the reference. The court could not proceed as special prosecutor Amjad Pervaiz was not available.
1.This site adheres to industry standards, and any reposted articles will clearly indicate the author and source;
Related Articles
-
China unveils fresh stimulus to boost ailing economy
2025-01-15 23:24
-
Unpacking the hybrid
2025-01-15 22:50
-
CINEMASCOPE: BODY DOUBLE TROUBLE
2025-01-15 21:47
-
Last-gasp Boniface gives Leverkusen victory, Stuttgart hammer Dortmund
2025-01-15 21:17
User Reviews
Recommended Reads
Hot Information
- Swat court acquits PTI workers in terrorism cases
- Humbert to face Fils in all-French final
- ARTSPEAK: STEP BACK TO MOVE FORWARD
- Israel has told US ground operations against Hezbollah are limited, State Dept says
- Pakistan to work with China against terrorism
- Israel once again carrying out attacks like a terrorist group: Turkish president
- Southee quits as NZ Test captain, hands over to Latham
- ANP seeks joint session of parliament on KP’s law and order situation
- Hospitals openly violate Punjab Healthcare Commission’s SOPs
Abont US
Follow our WhatasApp account to stay updated with the latest exciting content