PG Game
About 60 rockets fired from Lebanon into Israel: military
字号+ Author: Source:Sport 2025-01-15 18:31:07 I want to comment(0)
RAWALPINDI: A special court of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on Wednesday deferred the of f
RAWALPINDI: A special court of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on Wednesday deferred the of former prime minister Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, in a registered against them for purchasing an expensive Bulgari jewellery set from Toshakhana at a throwaway price. Judge Shahrukh Arjumand heard the case which was transferred to the special court by an accountability court after the Supreme Court to the National Accountability Ordinance made during the PDM government. The judge scheduled Oct 5 for indicting the founding PTI chairman and his spouse. When the court resumed hearing, a junior lawyer informed the judge that the former PM could not appoint the defence counsel and sought time so that he could engage his defence lawyer. Cross-examination of witness in £190m case remains inconclusive He sought week-long adjournment, which was opposed by the prosecution team. Prosecutor Syed Zulfiqar Abbas Naqvi pointed out that Mr Khan’s legal team would be visiting him at Adiala Jail, and he could engage lawyers for his defence in the case. The court then adjourned further hearing to Oct 5. The defence counsel could not conclude the cross-examination of the last prosecution witness in the £190m corruption reference against Mr Khan and Bushra Bibi. Accountability judge Nasir Javed Rana was hearing the case. The defence team informed the judge that senior lawyers were in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and requested for an adjournment. Subsequently, the hearing was adjourned till Thursday (today). Meanwhile, the IHC extended the stay order issued against the pronouncement of judgement in the same case. An IHC division bench comprising Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb extended the stay order till Oct 10 on a petition seeking acquittal of the couple in the reference. The court could not proceed as special prosecutor Amjad Pervaiz was not available.
1.This site adheres to industry standards, and any reposted articles will clearly indicate the author and source;
Related Articles
-
Another deadline set for opening of Malir Expressway’s first phase
2025-01-15 18:30
-
Three judicial officers penalised
2025-01-15 17:50
-
Man killed in explosion at junk shop
2025-01-15 17:40
-
‘Bilawal trying to build consensus on constitutional package’
2025-01-15 16:50
User Reviews
Recommended Reads
Hot Information
- Minor girl tortured by stepmother
- Massive protests held in Yemen, Bahrain against Israeli attacks on Gaza, Lebanon
- SC to take up defection clause ruling challenge on Sept 30th
- The myth and magic of palla fish
- CJP orders IIUI rector to leave courtroom for evading questions
- Northern Israeli hospitals instructed to shift to war footing
- Boston Marathon qualifiers left out amid running boom
- ATA case against 75 for holding eight cops hostage
- Putin threatens to use N-weapons if Ukraine hits Russia with Western missiles
Abont US
Follow our WhatasApp account to stay updated with the latest exciting content