Sport
Nationalism or racism?
字号+ Author: Source:PG Game 2025-01-16 01:34:13 I want to comment(0)
KARACHI: Two identical petitions landed in the Sindh High Court on Monday, challenging the Supreme
KARACHI: Two identical petitions landed in the Sindh High Court on Monday, challenging the Supreme Court (Practice and Procedure) Amendment Ordinance, which changed the composition of the three-judge committee of apex court about formation of benches. Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf-Sindh president Haleem Adil Sheikh and Advocate Mohammad Ghulam Rahman Korai separately moved the SHC, asking it to declare the impugned ordinance unconstitutional and ultra vires to the Constitution. The petition moved by the lawyer is fixed for hearing before a two-judge bench comprising Justice Yousuf Ali Sayeed and Justice Arbab Ali Hakro on Tuesday (today). Citing the secretaries, cabinet division, ministry of law and parliamentary affairs and others as respondents, petitioners submitted that there was no pressing emergency which warranted bypassing the legislative process of the parliament. Representing the PTI leader, Advocate Ali Tahir contended that the SC (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023 was a product of extensive parliamentary debate and to limit unilateral powers of chief justice about constitution of benches, but enactment of the impugned ordinance has effectively subverted the authority of parliament and rule of law. He also argued that the power of President to promulgate ordinances under Article 89 must be exercised in most exceptional circumstances where immediate action was required. The counsel further submitted that the impugned enactment reverted the almost exclusive powers of chief justice to constitute benches, and unilateral power of chief justice had previously attracted severe criticism, particularly regarding cases under Article 184(3) of Constitution, leading to lack of transparency and fairness. He maintained that such promulgation was also made in violation of various constitutional provisions related to fundamental rights specifically with regard to independence of judiciary and access to justice. Advocate Korai also submitted that the ordinance in question was promulgated in violation of various articles of the Constitution and there would be irreparable and irreversible loss to the independence of judiciary if the same was not set aside. Both the petitioners pleaded to declare the impugned ordinance unconstitutional, ultra vires to the constitution and of no legal effect as well as to set aside all actions, orders and decisions taken in pursuance of such ordinance. An election tribunal, headed by Justice Mohammad Karim Khan Agha of the Sindh High Court on Monday dismissed an application of MNA Sadiq Iftikhar of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement-Pakistan (MQM-P) questioning the maintainability of an election petition filed by the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf-Sindh president Haleem Adil Sheikh against his victory from NA-238.
1.This site adheres to industry standards, and any reposted articles will clearly indicate the author and source;
Related Articles
-
Global rice prices drop
2025-01-16 01:29
-
Centre’s ‘parsimony’ with relief funds irks PPP
2025-01-16 01:01
-
Lebanon official says strikes hit south Beirut as Israel orders evacuation
2025-01-15 23:50
-
Kabul keen to attend Brics summit in Russia
2025-01-15 23:07
User Reviews
Recommended Reads
Hot Information
- Heart of the matter
- Tehran ready for nuclear talks in New York ‘if other parties are willing’, foreign minister says
- PTI, PML-N trade barbs over clashes
- Finance: At a crossroad
- UK’s top diplomat calls for immediate ceasefire in Israel-Lebanon tensions
- Israel’s immunity to punishment for ‘massacre’ of Palestinians due to US backing: North Korea’s UN envoy
- 100 complaints registered about questions/answers in MDCAT
- FBR collection exceeds target in September
- Two women die in road accident
Abont US
Follow our WhatasApp account to stay updated with the latest exciting content