US
Fazl terms newly-passed laws against basic human rights
字号+ Author:Smart News Source:Travel 2025-01-13 08:42:04 I want to comment(0)
PESHAWAR: Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman on Sunday said that the laws were condemnable as it negated the spirit of . “If bills are being introduced that fall under the category of law and are passed after the 26th Amendment, it negates the spirit of the 26th Amendment,” he said. He was talking to journalists after visiting Bilour House to offer for the departed soul of former senator Ilyas Ahmad Bilour. He said that such an attitude by the governments always proved unsustainable and viable steps should be taken for satisfaction of people. Mr Rehman said that every Pakistan had become a suspect-by-birth as the changes in the law permitted that anyone could be detained on suspicion for 90 days and beyond. JUI-F chief says govt focusing on politics instead of welfare of people “The provision related to Article 8 of the Constitution was removed from the [draft] of the 26th Amendment but now permission is given where anyone can be detained on suspicion. It is just like NAB laws where every Pakistani citizen was a convict-by-birth and the convicts had to prove themselves innocent,” he said. The JUI-F chief said that politicians never did anything for people and their rights. He termed the new laws against the basic human rights. “We complain when visas are refused to Pakistanis. If we see them as suspects in our own countries, other countries would definitely treat them as suspects,” he added. To a question about the prevailing law and order situation in the country, he said that security situation in the province was worse. He said that the residents of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa had been going through miseries for last 15 years. He added that Balochistan also faced the same situation and government had lost its writ there. Mr Rehman said that government was focusing on politics, confrontation with province and confrontation with the centre rather performing its due job and protecting life and property of people. He said that differences always existed among political parties. He said that JUI-F too had reservations about 26th Amendment but it held discussion for over a month and deliberated over every single clause of the amendment. “Wherever JUI-F could do, it convinced government on withdrawing certain sections and the 26th Constitution Amendment was later accepted,” he said.
1.This site adheres to industry standards, and any reposted articles will clearly indicate the author and source;
Related Articles
-
IMF okays review of Sri Lanka’s $2.9bn bailout
2025-01-13 07:52
-
Italy recovers artefacts dug up by ‘amateurish’ tomb raiders
2025-01-13 07:31
-
IAEA says Iran has offered to cap stock of sensitive uranium
2025-01-13 06:54
-
NDMA sends 17 tonnes of aid to Gaza, Lebanon and Syria
2025-01-13 06:28
User Reviews
Recommended Reads
Hot Information
- Republican senator calls on House to share Matt Gaetz ethics report
- Trump plans to use military for mass deportation
- Arguments sought by LHC on maintainability of contempt plea against PM
- STP chief asks PPP to give up ‘hypocrisy’ over canals project
- Short-changed?
- Two stabbed to death in New York
- LHC concerned at delay in rules for free education
- SPELT conference ends on an optimistic note
- Petrol, diesel unchanged, RLNG rate increased
Abont US
Follow our WhatasApp account to stay updated with the latest exciting content