Travel
We have not been informed about delay in £190m case verdict: Imran’s lawyer
字号+ Author:Smart News Source:Business 2025-01-09 16:02:57 I want to comment(0)
Amid rumours about the verdict in the Al-Qadir Trust case being deferred, one of the lawyers representing PTI founder Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, stated on Sunday that there has been no confirmation that the verdict has been postponed. On December 23 — the original date the verdict was supposed to be announced — an Islamabad accountability court its verdict in the case until January 6 due to winter vacations. Judge Nasir Javed Rana said, “The verdict will not be announced today; [winter] vacations are coming and there is also a course at the high court.” Officially, the court went on winter vacation from December 24 until January 1. Imran and Bushra were in the case on February 27, shortly after the general elections. The alleges that Imran and Bushra obtained billions of rupees and land worth hundreds of kanals from Bahria Town Ltd for legalising Rs50 billion that was identified and returned to the country by the United Kingdom during the previous PTI government. contacted lawyer Khalid Yousuf Chaudhry, who said that the court had not informed the PTI founder’s legal team about the postponement. “The court staff did not confirm whether the verdict had been delayed,” he said. In a video statement seen by , Chaudhry addressed rumours circulating on social media that the date of the verdict has changed, with other users claiming it will be announced in 10-12 days. “Social media and TV channels are claiming that the verdict has been postponed,” he said. “I want to say that we have not yet received any information about this. “Our legal team has not been informed whether we have to go to Adiala Jail or the judicial complex in G-11 for the verdict hearing,” Chaudhry clarified. “I have been trying to contact the court staff since this morning about where the hearing will be, but we have not received any official information.” Chaudhry said that the defence not being informed about where the hearing would take place is a “major question mark for the judiciary”.
1.This site adheres to industry standards, and any reposted articles will clearly indicate the author and source;
Related Articles
-
Squid Game Season 3: First look unveils eerie new addition to cast
2025-01-09 15:48
-
Ariana Grande promises new music project 'will be coming out' soon
2025-01-09 14:48
-
James Middleton reflects on simple family holidays with Princess Kate
2025-01-09 13:35
-
Sebastian Stan delivers empowering speech after first-ever Golden Globe
2025-01-09 13:29
User Reviews
Recommended Reads
Hot Information
- King Charles ‘worried’ for Prince Harry as Andrew threatens new trouble
- Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds snub 2025 Golden Globes amid Justin Baldoni lawsuit
- Anthony Mackie gushes about 'normal' Harrison Ford, ‘He'd chill with us’
- Prince Harry replaced by key figure as Prince William prepares to rule
- مہگان مارکل نے شہزادہ ہیری کے خیال کی مخالفت کر کے انہیں رولا دیا۔
- Tulisa Contostavlos feeling better after painful health struggles
- Prince Harry replaced by key figure as Prince William prepares to rule
- Dwayne Johnson triggers feud rumours after Vin Diesel's Golden Globes nod
- What's Neelam Muneer's take on cosmetic surgery?
Abont US
Follow our WhatasApp account to stay updated with the latest exciting content