PG Game
Workers warn govt of protest if minimum wage notification not issued
字号+ Author: Source:PG Game 2025-01-15 22:31:58 I want to comment(0)
RAWALPINDI: A special court of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on Wednesday deferred the of f
RAWALPINDI: A special court of the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) on Wednesday deferred the of former prime minister Imran Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, in a registered against them for purchasing an expensive Bulgari jewellery set from Toshakhana at a throwaway price. Judge Shahrukh Arjumand heard the case which was transferred to the special court by an accountability court after the Supreme Court to the National Accountability Ordinance made during the PDM government. The judge scheduled Oct 5 for indicting the founding PTI chairman and his spouse. When the court resumed hearing, a junior lawyer informed the judge that the former PM could not appoint the defence counsel and sought time so that he could engage his defence lawyer. Cross-examination of witness in £190m case remains inconclusive He sought week-long adjournment, which was opposed by the prosecution team. Prosecutor Syed Zulfiqar Abbas Naqvi pointed out that Mr Khan’s legal team would be visiting him at Adiala Jail, and he could engage lawyers for his defence in the case. The court then adjourned further hearing to Oct 5. The defence counsel could not conclude the cross-examination of the last prosecution witness in the £190m corruption reference against Mr Khan and Bushra Bibi. Accountability judge Nasir Javed Rana was hearing the case. The defence team informed the judge that senior lawyers were in the Islamabad High Court (IHC) and requested for an adjournment. Subsequently, the hearing was adjourned till Thursday (today). Meanwhile, the IHC extended the stay order issued against the pronouncement of judgement in the same case. An IHC division bench comprising Chief Justice Aamer Farooq and Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb extended the stay order till Oct 10 on a petition seeking acquittal of the couple in the reference. The court could not proceed as special prosecutor Amjad Pervaiz was not available.
1.This site adheres to industry standards, and any reposted articles will clearly indicate the author and source;
Related Articles
-
STP says Sindh will not accept new canals project
2025-01-15 22:11
-
Last-gasp Boniface gives Leverkusen victory, Stuttgart hammer Dortmund
2025-01-15 22:03
-
‘Big threats on my life by Iran,’ Donald Trump claims
2025-01-15 21:02
-
Police commando martyred during encounter with criminals
2025-01-15 20:28
User Reviews
Recommended Reads
Hot Information
- NAB inquiry against LUH officer in process, SHC told
- President Zardari signs off on changes to SC (Practice and Procedure) Act, 2023
- Lightning claims farmer’s life
- Israel embassy in Sweden target of shooting, no-one hurt: police
- Sinner ‘very disappointed’ as doping case reignites with WADA appeal
- English Access programme transforms lives of students from backward areas
- PHC stops police from acting against foreign export company
- Article 63-A review: SC dismisses objection raised over bench by Imran’s counsel
- Over 70 new dengue cases reported in KP
Abont US
Follow our WhatasApp account to stay updated with the latest exciting content